Sunday, November 26, 2006
Karl Barth on archaelogical research
I do not like books that try to prove the rightness of the Bible by archaeological research, but the results of this research are an important help in understanding the biblical witness to Christ. However, no historical research can help us prove God's revelation as reality. Historical research will never be an approach to the Word of God. --Karl Barth
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
.jpg)
Now our feet touched the soil of the mission field we are assigned, we immediately looked for a local church. We found one right away; the c... -
Whether we are in the Philippines or in Thailand, December proved to be the busiest month of the year for us. This is the reason this blog h... -
Text: Galatians 4:6-7 Today is “FATHER’S DAY”. This is the day of the year when we remember and honor our earthly fathers. Fo most of us thi... -
My wife and I went looking for a house. We consider our present house to be too big and expensive for missionaries like us. Our friend recom...
1 comment:
What do you really know about what may or may not have happened 2000 years ago?
And about the POLITICAL process by which the many many existing Christian texts of the time were put together to form the "official" Bible?
Why were some texts chosen and others omitted?
Why were ALL the texts edited?
Why were the many gnostic writings of the time totally eliminated?
That having being said this essay provides a clue as to the POWER politics behind the formation of the "official" church.
1. www.dabase.net/proofch6.htm#idol
Post a Comment