I was meaning to post my response to the current book I am reading this week but I have been very busy and besides my brain is not really working properly as of late (it never does anyway). I hope to make up for this next week.
I am citing here Kung’s insights about the church. Kung admits that his early theology is a result of his dialogue with Karl Barth and following him, Kung emphasizes the universality of redemption through Jesus Christ. He says that “”Jesus Christ, in his pre-existence, does not stand alone in the Father’s sight. According to the words of the Sacred Scripture, he stands before the Father together with the church and, indeed, together with humankind. In God’s eternity we human beings, too, were chosen with and in Jesus Christ.”
Kung gives the five ecclesiastical imperatives that arise out of Jesus’ preaching for the church:
- The church must not become an end in itself in the present;
- It must not build its own achievements;
- It must not understand itself as religious-political theocracy, but rather as a spiritual diakonia;
- The church is not there for the pious and just but for the godless and sinners;
- The church has to do God’s will;
“It must not shut itself off from the world in a spirit of asceticism, but live in the everyday world, inspired by the radical obedience of love towards God’s will; it must not try to escape from the world, but work in the world.”
1 comment:
The truth of the matter is that the "church" INEVITABLY became the servant of worldly power when it was coopted by the Roman state. A "holy" empire being the ultimate oxymoron.
And the "church" has INEVITABLY been an integral part of the western imperialist mis-adventure, with its drive to total power and control, ever since.
SUBMIT/CONVERT OR DIE!!
These 2 essays provide some cotext for understanding the origins & consequences of the baneful influence of the "church" in world affairs.
1. www.dabase.net/proofch6.htm#idol
www/beezone.com/AdiDa/jesusandme.html
Post a Comment